Sunday, December 29, 2019

Against Proposition 69 and the DNA Fingerprint Act Essay

Abstract: California’s Proposition 69 and the DNA Fingerprint Act both expand criminal DNA databases far beyond what is necessary to protect citizens and prosecute violent crime. DNA profiling techniques and databases have developed largely over the last fifteen years, and the recent expansions are only a part of an ongoing trend of ‘function creep’ that characterizes database expansion. Proposition 69 and the DNA Fingerprint Act expand DNA databases originally designed to house DNA samples from violent criminals to include samples from anyone arrested for a felony crime. This is unreasonable because many persons arrested for felonies are ever convicted or even tried, but under these expansions their DNA will be stored in a†¦show more content†¦It was generally accepted that a DNA sample from a crime scene could be analyzed and compared with a sample from a suspect. A match could place the suspect at the scene of the crime and likely would produce a conviction. But if there are not suspects in a case, an analyzed DNA sample from the crime scene does not significantly help prosecutors. This dilemma, along with the development of the polymerase chain reaction technique in 19851, led to the establishment of DNA databases. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR), which isolates small fragments of DNA that have a high degree of variability from individual to individual and copies them repeatedly, is the most effective and widely used forensic identification technique today1. It is the case of analyzing and profiling a DNA sample with PCR that makes large-scale electronic DNA databases possible. Although privacy advocates have not found any instance of database abuse since databases were created in the early 1990s4, DNA profiles contain sensitive genetic information that could still potentially be used for unethical genetic and eugenic experiments if the proper restrictions are not placed on profiling. It may seem farfetched that a simple cheek swab could lead to such abuses, but it must be noted that twenty-five years ago the concept of DNA profiling was merely science fiction. Furthermore, the nature of DNA sampling is better suited for use inShow MoreRelatedInnovators Dna84615 Words   |  339 Pagesin uenced by e Innovator’s Dilemma and e Innovator’s Solution. Now e Innovator’s DNA shows where it all starts. is book gives you the fundamental building blocks for becoming more innovative and changing the world. One of the most important books to come out this year, and one that will remain pivotal reading for years to come.† Chairman and CEO, salesforce.com; author, Behind the Cloud â€Å" e Innovator’s DNA is the ‘how to’ manual to innovation, and to the fresh thinking that is the rootRead MoreLogical Reasoning189930 Words   |  760 Pages............................................................ 220 Exercises .......................................................................................................................................... 220 CHAPTER 7 Defending Against Deception ............................................................................. 226 Deception Is All Around Us ............................................................................................................. 227 Exaggeration

Friday, December 20, 2019

Attentention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder or ADHD and...

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder also known as ADHD is the common childhood brain disorders and can continue through adolescence and even adulthood. The symptoms of ADHD includes sign of inattention, hyperactivity and implusivity. (National Institute of Mental Health (NIH), 2012). Children with ADHD tend to experience problems in completing a task, academic performance and are often unpopular among peers. (Barlow Durand, 2012). Treatments for ADHD is classified into non medicine treatments and medicine treatments. Non medicine treatments are divided into Biological and Psychosocial interventions. The objective of biological approach is to minimise childrens abrupt behavior, and enhancing their attentional skills. (Barlow †¦show more content†¦(Barkley, 2002). Child training intervention target on a step-wise method in completing an assignment through building method from adult verbal instructions to self explanation followed by appraisal of children performance. Among these three methods, parent training intervention is a better method in treating ADHD. According to Rajwan, Chacko Moeller, 2012, Children undergo the parent training intervention not only show a change in opposing, violent, disruptive behavior, but also shown an improvement in attention skills and hyperactivity. Teacher training intervention is not preferred as it shows change in childrens behavior, productivity and accuracy for a short period of time. (Barkley, 2002). Furthermore, children that has discontinued from teacher training intervention before shows no effect if they were to be exposed to similar intervention again. Another treatment method for ADHD will be the medicinal treatment. According to myADHD, n.d, there are two types of medication: stimulant and non stimulant. Example of stimulant are methylphendiate and amphetamine. Example of non stimulant is atomoxetine. By comparing parent training intervention method with medication, medication will be a better choice. According to a research by Grizenko, Cai, Jolicoeur, Ter-Stepanian Joober, 2013, short term usage of methylphendiate will decrease children abrupt behavior and increase their problem solving

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Flashbulb Memory Essay Example For Students

Flashbulb Memory Essay Violence in the MediaBefore the average American chld leaves elementry school, researchers estemate the have witnessd 8.000 murders on television, is it really a question why America is the world leader in real crime and violence? (Frontline exmines Impact of Television on Scocioty in Does TV kill)A growing body of research suports theorys that explain how exposure to medi violence would activate agressive attitudes ins ome chldren. Humans begin immitating other individuals at a very early age (Violnce in the media and its effects on youth violence.)Childerens role models are from TV, what child doesent want to be a Ninja Turtle or spider man for halloween? My brother always loved Looney Toons and watched it every day whe he was a child, every day he watched the Wildly Cioty get blown up or bugs buny trick elmur fud into a death trap. watching a lot of violence via the media may mean children adults may demonstrate more aggressive behaviour themselves, or they may have more approvin g attitudes towards the use of violence to resolve conflicts(http://www.mediaknowall.com/violence/effectsnotes.html)Children spend more time with the TV then with friends or with family.There are so many different kinds of violent shows on television these days, it seems as if violence apeals to every kind of veiwer. Violence is glorifide in cartoons lke SpiderMan or Xman, or in the WWF, even reality TV shows glorify violence. It seem the more explosions and shootings are in a TV show, the more kids fallow it. Think of what clips they put in preveiws to get you to watch, big explosion after big exposion.Violence sells. Humans become Immune to things they are consantly exposed to. If you were constanlt exposed to voilence you are going to become numb to it. Desensitiation-exposure to media violence may mean children in particular become less sensitive to violence occuring around them, and less sensitive to the pain and suffering that violence causes to others. They also have less se nsitive views on acceptable levels of violence in society ie they are prepared to tolerate more (http://www.mediaknowall.com/violence/effectsnotes.html)Chidren see so much violence on TV they may block it out in the real world, accept it, or think vioolence is ok. It had been proven by a scientist called Leonard Eron that their is a positve corritlation between children who watch more violent shows at home, and how much they get in trouble at school.(Frontline exmines Impact of Television on Scocioty in Does TV kill) Research showed that familys who veiw TV frequently, and let their kids watch what they want, have more problems with their childs behavior in school. Chldrens wos parents moniter their veiwing have shown to have segnificantly less problems. Also children with problems at shcool who have had their TV privlages revoced have shown a qucker behvior change. With so much proof that their is a lin betwwen the media and violcen in children, its hard to beleive parents let chldrenw atch so much TV. A growing body of research suports theorys that explain how exposure to medi violence would activate agressive attitudes ins ome chldren. Humans begin immitating other individuals at a very early age (Violnce in the media and its effects on youth violence.)Chldren link TV wth reality. They dont know big birs cant talk and cookie wonsters are just pretend. They dont know theirs no gotham city and that Bat man wont come and save the day. Because of thee fact they think things on TV are real, it leads them to beleive that their actualy is as much voilence in the real world, and is acceptes as much as is protrayed on TV. this is called mean world syndrome. Mean world syndrome Watching large amounts of violence on TV may lead children and adults to believe that the real world contains this amount of pain and violence, and therefore they begin to view their environment as a mean and dangerous place. (http://www.mediaknowall.com/violence/effectsnotes.html) It is also a question of how much TV they watch. If a child is watching so much TV, and not spending their time with other activites, they are obveously going to learn more from the television then a child who spends more time interacing with other people. Excessive childhood involvment with elevtronice media that limit scocial interaction could hinder the brain scocial system. ( The effects of electornic media on a developing brain)Many People argue that violence in the media is not the cause of violce in children. Statisstcs have undoughable proven otherwise. it has been proven that the kids who watch more are more violent. t is proven that the kids who dont have restraints in what they watch display more angry behavior. It is proven tha kids who have their Tv privilages taken away reform their behavior. With all this proof, we can not deny that although their are toher factors contributing to violence in children, TV violnce id definatly a contributing factor. .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 , .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 .postImageUrl , .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 , .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3:hover , .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3:visited , .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3:active { border:0!important; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3:active , .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3 .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ubf6948310ae5c82e9ad406d7adb3bae3:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Booker T. Washington (1336 words) Essay